All this time I have been reading people writing, "they have not isolated the virus" or similar, and yet here we have a literal photograph of its 100nm self.
I can only imagine how much worse it would have been if Dan had already sold us down the Belt and Road path like Italy had, and we had an influx of Wuhan infectees flying in post-Chinese new year.
lots of people still are saying no virus was ever isolated. on the other hand, several people described the insert spot, so if it were not isolated how could they know? I don't know the least bit about meds, and this is extremely confusing. I want to believe DrGeoff and Dr Vanden Bossche et Al, but then you read of bunches of others with grand titles who say the opposite! It is almost as confusing as people trying to tell you what to eat to stay healthy LOL.
That's a version of how they take a truth and marry it to a lie so that if you speak the truth, it's associated with a lie and the whole thing is disbelieved as a paired unit. Such as saying "they are using mind control technology on us, and it's done by aliens..." they are in fact using mind control techniques and technologies on us, but its not done by aliens. Likewise, by speaking the truth in a fictionalized media-based scenario, such as a sitcom, they pair the truth with a fiction, and then it gets associated with a fiction. This is also how humor works to communicate a truth. If you say something as a joke, but its really the way you feel about something, say joke about how someone needs to take a shower more often or needs to lay off of the candy bars because they are too fat, it hides the seriousness of the message somewhat. Similar psychological principle. In the case of pairing a joke with an inconvenient truth, you are trying not to step on any toes, but still get the message across. In the case of pairing the inconvenient truth with media, it acts to nullify it if someone brings in up in conversation or in blogging, etc. A preemptive strike in this manner diffuses the power of the message and also makes it either linked to humor or linked to fiction. So this type of psyops deliberately seeds extremist beliefs about covid, and I believe that Dr. Michael Yeadon is associated with this, because now he is saying that there is no such thing as viruses or somesuch and that they have never proven that they existed or whatever, when before he seemed a voice on our side, but then he started saying ridiculous things and now his credulity is ruined in my book. Maybe he just spoke out against it so he could get a payoff, or maybe they threatened his family. In any event, when they use this type of psyop and people believe it and spread it, it affixes to the label of conspiracy theorist diatribe, yet another successful psyop around the term "conspiracy theorist," and waters down the true anti-vaccine empirically based reporting. So I've been seeing this one all over, people saying there is no such thing as vaccines that work and no such thing as viruses. Of course there is, on both counts. By manipulation of individuals into polarized/all-or-none views and the tendency for people to allow themselves to become so polarized, their "standing up" for the truth becomes poisoned and then no one takes them seriously. I take these kinds of weaponized mind control methodologies very seriously and everyone needs to watch out for their effects. Divide and conquer narratives as well. Split the opposing teams into factions so they don't organize effectively. Make everyone jump onto extremist bandwagons and then it all looks like a circus and no one believes shit anymore that they read. It's downright diabolical level of state witchcraft, honed over centuries.
I suspect that it was pre-planned. Take a big name Pfizer executive who still actually works for Pfizer on the down-low, someone with good creds, and then make him say some ridiculous shit about vaccines and viruses, and because he was such a big name, it weakens the similar arguments that anyone else might make, like the boy who cried wolf scenario in a way. I know I'm sounding redundant here, but I'm trying to wrap my mind around the science of how they do this mental manipulation stuff, which yes it might be in the Psychology or Sociology literature somewhere, but I suspect that the textbooks that are written on the subtopic are not something you will get taught in school, more likely it's something that counteringelligence teaches and since DoD and non-USA equivalents probably has their hands in this, they pre-emptively designed a counterintelligence campaign to deal with any assumed fallout that would occur once they rolled these covid vaccines out.
Slides are platinum! Like Stoichastic see so many that still haven't confirmed its existence, even Mike Yeadon I thought I heard him say it a while back
I was trained to do PCR when I worked in a genetics lab. I became interested in the so-called "non-coding" regions of the human genome and how foreign RNA can be incorporated.
All this time I have been reading people writing, "they have not isolated the virus" or similar, and yet here we have a literal photograph of its 100nm self.
Thanks!
Do we know why he came to Melbourne?
I don't know his profession, but it would be interesting to learn more. China is the largest trading partner of Australia.
I can only imagine how much worse it would have been if Dan had already sold us down the Belt and Road path like Italy had, and we had an influx of Wuhan infectees flying in post-Chinese new year.
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-09a
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-b7c
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-20e
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-01f
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-f29
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-5cc
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-c6f
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-228
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-0ad
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-c2c
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-b7c etc. etc.
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-66c
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-64b
It would help if you altered the titles of all your multiple posts so people might be inclined to look for relevance.
I honestly thought it was a spam bot :-/
Me too stack acct is confusing
lots of people still are saying no virus was ever isolated. on the other hand, several people described the insert spot, so if it were not isolated how could they know? I don't know the least bit about meds, and this is extremely confusing. I want to believe DrGeoff and Dr Vanden Bossche et Al, but then you read of bunches of others with grand titles who say the opposite! It is almost as confusing as people trying to tell you what to eat to stay healthy LOL.
Anyone who says the Wuhan Weaponized Coronavirus was never isolated is a Waste of Space.
thank you for clearing that up ! I kept the article and the link so if I see some more disinformation I will post it !
That's a version of how they take a truth and marry it to a lie so that if you speak the truth, it's associated with a lie and the whole thing is disbelieved as a paired unit. Such as saying "they are using mind control technology on us, and it's done by aliens..." they are in fact using mind control techniques and technologies on us, but its not done by aliens. Likewise, by speaking the truth in a fictionalized media-based scenario, such as a sitcom, they pair the truth with a fiction, and then it gets associated with a fiction. This is also how humor works to communicate a truth. If you say something as a joke, but its really the way you feel about something, say joke about how someone needs to take a shower more often or needs to lay off of the candy bars because they are too fat, it hides the seriousness of the message somewhat. Similar psychological principle. In the case of pairing a joke with an inconvenient truth, you are trying not to step on any toes, but still get the message across. In the case of pairing the inconvenient truth with media, it acts to nullify it if someone brings in up in conversation or in blogging, etc. A preemptive strike in this manner diffuses the power of the message and also makes it either linked to humor or linked to fiction. So this type of psyops deliberately seeds extremist beliefs about covid, and I believe that Dr. Michael Yeadon is associated with this, because now he is saying that there is no such thing as viruses or somesuch and that they have never proven that they existed or whatever, when before he seemed a voice on our side, but then he started saying ridiculous things and now his credulity is ruined in my book. Maybe he just spoke out against it so he could get a payoff, or maybe they threatened his family. In any event, when they use this type of psyop and people believe it and spread it, it affixes to the label of conspiracy theorist diatribe, yet another successful psyop around the term "conspiracy theorist," and waters down the true anti-vaccine empirically based reporting. So I've been seeing this one all over, people saying there is no such thing as vaccines that work and no such thing as viruses. Of course there is, on both counts. By manipulation of individuals into polarized/all-or-none views and the tendency for people to allow themselves to become so polarized, their "standing up" for the truth becomes poisoned and then no one takes them seriously. I take these kinds of weaponized mind control methodologies very seriously and everyone needs to watch out for their effects. Divide and conquer narratives as well. Split the opposing teams into factions so they don't organize effectively. Make everyone jump onto extremist bandwagons and then it all looks like a circus and no one believes shit anymore that they read. It's downright diabolical level of state witchcraft, honed over centuries.
Yeadon and a few of his chums were given Millions of pounds to leave Pfizer and do their own thing.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/endotoxin-expert-patrick-vallance
I suspect that it was pre-planned. Take a big name Pfizer executive who still actually works for Pfizer on the down-low, someone with good creds, and then make him say some ridiculous shit about vaccines and viruses, and because he was such a big name, it weakens the similar arguments that anyone else might make, like the boy who cried wolf scenario in a way. I know I'm sounding redundant here, but I'm trying to wrap my mind around the science of how they do this mental manipulation stuff, which yes it might be in the Psychology or Sociology literature somewhere, but I suspect that the textbooks that are written on the subtopic are not something you will get taught in school, more likely it's something that counteringelligence teaches and since DoD and non-USA equivalents probably has their hands in this, they pre-emptively designed a counterintelligence campaign to deal with any assumed fallout that would occur once they rolled these covid vaccines out.
Robert Malone and his wife Jill have written nice articles and books on Psyops. And of course David Martin has done great stuff on the timeline. https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-used-synthetic-life-derived
Geoff, I previously commented on this study. Do you remove my commment?
Yes
why?
Slides are platinum! Like Stoichastic see so many that still haven't confirmed its existence, even Mike Yeadon I thought I heard him say it a while back
I'm being laughed 🤣 at but seems legit science debate material
Echo chambers are not science
Do you have work on PCR tests
Heard sugar hypothesis before but had not with the clarity and direct comparison to nanotechnology etc
I was trained to do PCR when I worked in a genetics lab. I became interested in the so-called "non-coding" regions of the human genome and how foreign RNA can be incorporated.