I've always been wondering who is seeding these myths. It seems traps are laid out whereever I look.
Try to research the vaccine critically - get fear of 5G and nanotech
Try to research SARS-CoV-2 critically - get virus denialism
Try to research the wrong family critically - get an anti-Jewish narrative
It's a pattern and I am very curious how much of this can be blamed on psychological dynamics and how much is intentionally being seeded to divide further.
After a few years of study of the issue I would suspect 99% of this garbage is seeded by paid propagandist.
Not one who complies with basic duties of journalism as far as sourcing or rebuttals handling is concerned. Not one who hasn't a most dubious past or highly visible conflicts after investigation.
And to answer Geoff's point, we should definitely name & shame them when it's clearly identified that they are paid shills. It has lasted long enough and has corrupted or slowed down the search of truth of countless honest people.
Or how much is already embedded in the way we use language, words, numbers and science, without all of us, to some extent, even knowing.
The "who" you refer to is the same q I have in Who are "those with a hidden agenda"? And why do they do things like this? WTF, is it a rubiks cube to figure out how everyone is lying all the time? To themselves too?
We must keep our eyes on the prize. The infighting and bickering is distracting. Is it ego driven? What would that tell you? What difference would it make? Hey if a little "fight fire with fire" helps, who cares right. The childish one's could still be a strength in our aresenol. Anything worth fighting for usually doesn't come free, cheap, or easy. Be like water. Go with the flow. Anywho. . . I'd like to finish up with a share. After a year of o chem, which I learned I loved to my surprise, I apprehensively and reluctantly approached my awesome instructor Dr Dixon and told him that I had been moved to the point of believing that I saw God in o chem. He just smiled. I smiled very happily back. And yes, I do believe that we will evolve with whatever comes our way. We always have ; ) and it's never really been our choice. That's the beauty of Evolution.
I am wondering whether you have come across the elegant bridging hypothesis put forward by JJ Couey (Gigaohm Biological), based on the discovery of the exosomal intercellular communication system and its similarity to virus particles? Couey is a biologist trying to expose the coup, aware of controlled opposition, but also offering an explanation which could bring together seemingly opposing "camps" of the resistance, including the "no virus" people. This is the most thorough statement, although long. (The section about exosomes is mostly at the 2 hour mark and beyond but if you are new to Couey I would start at the beginning.) https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1732565791 Couey has also recently explained some of this hypothesis to Paul Alexander and Michael Yeadon.
Thanks, I have watched JJ a number of times. The idea that "replication incompetent clones" are the major entities emitted in saliva is complete garbage.
Yeadon is unfortunately spreading lunacy.
Paul Alexander is promoting the developer of the Pfizer jab Katalin Karikó as a heroine.
I've always been wondering who is seeding these myths. It seems traps are laid out whereever I look.
Try to research the vaccine critically - get fear of 5G and nanotech
Try to research SARS-CoV-2 critically - get virus denialism
Try to research the wrong family critically - get an anti-Jewish narrative
It's a pattern and I am very curious how much of this can be blamed on psychological dynamics and how much is intentionally being seeded to divide further.
After a few years of study of the issue I would suspect 99% of this garbage is seeded by paid propagandist.
Not one who complies with basic duties of journalism as far as sourcing or rebuttals handling is concerned. Not one who hasn't a most dubious past or highly visible conflicts after investigation.
And to answer Geoff's point, we should definitely name & shame them when it's clearly identified that they are paid shills. It has lasted long enough and has corrupted or slowed down the search of truth of countless honest people.
Or how much is already embedded in the way we use language, words, numbers and science, without all of us, to some extent, even knowing.
The "who" you refer to is the same q I have in Who are "those with a hidden agenda"? And why do they do things like this? WTF, is it a rubiks cube to figure out how everyone is lying all the time? To themselves too?
We must keep our eyes on the prize. The infighting and bickering is distracting. Is it ego driven? What would that tell you? What difference would it make? Hey if a little "fight fire with fire" helps, who cares right. The childish one's could still be a strength in our aresenol. Anything worth fighting for usually doesn't come free, cheap, or easy. Be like water. Go with the flow. Anywho. . . I'd like to finish up with a share. After a year of o chem, which I learned I loved to my surprise, I apprehensively and reluctantly approached my awesome instructor Dr Dixon and told him that I had been moved to the point of believing that I saw God in o chem. He just smiled. I smiled very happily back. And yes, I do believe that we will evolve with whatever comes our way. We always have ; ) and it's never really been our choice. That's the beauty of Evolution.
I am wondering whether you have come across the elegant bridging hypothesis put forward by JJ Couey (Gigaohm Biological), based on the discovery of the exosomal intercellular communication system and its similarity to virus particles? Couey is a biologist trying to expose the coup, aware of controlled opposition, but also offering an explanation which could bring together seemingly opposing "camps" of the resistance, including the "no virus" people. This is the most thorough statement, although long. (The section about exosomes is mostly at the 2 hour mark and beyond but if you are new to Couey I would start at the beginning.) https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1732565791 Couey has also recently explained some of this hypothesis to Paul Alexander and Michael Yeadon.
Thanks, I have watched JJ a number of times. The idea that "replication incompetent clones" are the major entities emitted in saliva is complete garbage.
Yeadon is unfortunately spreading lunacy.
Paul Alexander is promoting the developer of the Pfizer jab Katalin Karikó as a heroine.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/women-suffer-more-from-pfizer-endotoxin
Live Covid19 virus is exported all around the world for research and reference.
Millions of full sequences have been done on replication competent virus from swabs taken from the nasopharyngeal tissues, saliva and surfaces.
Wuhan being a major trading centre and Pfizer base with German and American bioweapons labs is the obvious and traceable source of global calamity.