Geoff Peru graph has a supporting V shape re withdrawal of iverm and inc covid . The prior period May to Aug shows build up to covid max, was there a slow uptake of Ivm then? I was recently in Nicaragua and their pharmacies sold iverm over the counter. I asked what they used it for, answer: covid! So it appears that iverm should not be given to pregnant women?
Of course I don’t give medical advice. There are many papers warning it should not be given to pregnant women and some authors want a registry for women taking it accdentally. Lots of problems looking at Covid19 timelines with initial lack of testing, then lockdowns, and the virus mutating. I personally would not take Ivermectin or any drugs recommended by TWC. 240,344 Iatrocides running total is an underestmate from just 37 Big Pharma drugs.
Hi Geoff, lost my iverm thread on ade, but saw the meiotic issue. As a 69 yr old, I took over for 2 yrs straight instead of Faxine, so no meiosis at that age, hoping mitosis not damaged. No outward signs. Can you please get me back to that thread, interested in the following conversation.
I didn't know that. I know Fauci knew it worked years ago there is a newspaper clip of him saying it and I am sure we will find that many people in high places used it to protect themselves and said they had jabs when they didn't.
One of the ongoing pharma crimes is the ability of big companies to buy out others to then take products off the market to protect their own sales. They say the product is not worth making or change the formulation so it doesn't work as well then sales drop. They buy out generic competitors to stop them marketing cheaper competitors (sometimes before they even get approval or just after.
It suspect it happens in other industries too - from memory Bose recently developed a new hearing then almost immediately decided it wasn't going to market it... weird? Or a university actually does come up with a good product. Investors decide it is not worth it and it dies before it gets any further. Film companies cancelling films they have spent years and billions making and claiming tax. For as long as the primary goal in a company is to benefit the shareholders (financially) we are not going to change it.
On the face of it ESG should have helped but we know what a con that turned out to be.
Geoff Peru graph has a supporting V shape re withdrawal of iverm and inc covid . The prior period May to Aug shows build up to covid max, was there a slow uptake of Ivm then? I was recently in Nicaragua and their pharmacies sold iverm over the counter. I asked what they used it for, answer: covid! So it appears that iverm should not be given to pregnant women?
Of course I don’t give medical advice. There are many papers warning it should not be given to pregnant women and some authors want a registry for women taking it accdentally. Lots of problems looking at Covid19 timelines with initial lack of testing, then lockdowns, and the virus mutating. I personally would not take Ivermectin or any drugs recommended by TWC. 240,344 Iatrocides running total is an underestmate from just 37 Big Pharma drugs.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/guide-to-big-pharma-grifter-iatrocide
Hi Geoff, lost my iverm thread on ade, but saw the meiotic issue. As a 69 yr old, I took over for 2 yrs straight instead of Faxine, so no meiosis at that age, hoping mitosis not damaged. No outward signs. Can you please get me back to that thread, interested in the following conversation.
ade ? Here is MBZ
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/mebendazole-aneugen-mutagen-teratogen
I didn't know that. I know Fauci knew it worked years ago there is a newspaper clip of him saying it and I am sure we will find that many people in high places used it to protect themselves and said they had jabs when they didn't.
One of the ongoing pharma crimes is the ability of big companies to buy out others to then take products off the market to protect their own sales. They say the product is not worth making or change the formulation so it doesn't work as well then sales drop. They buy out generic competitors to stop them marketing cheaper competitors (sometimes before they even get approval or just after.
It suspect it happens in other industries too - from memory Bose recently developed a new hearing then almost immediately decided it wasn't going to market it... weird? Or a university actually does come up with a good product. Investors decide it is not worth it and it dies before it gets any further. Film companies cancelling films they have spent years and billions making and claiming tax. For as long as the primary goal in a company is to benefit the shareholders (financially) we are not going to change it.
On the face of it ESG should have helped but we know what a con that turned out to be.
I must have missed the part about PFIZER USING IVERMECTIN the first time you wrote about it. Now I want to scream it all over!
In Japan, they sell Screaming Mufflers.