Placebos Designed to Cause Harms in Pregnant Women and their Children
Placebos Designed to Cause Harms in Pregnant Women and their Children
In clinical trials of experimental jabs, volunteers receiving the Test substance or Placebo often don't know what risks they have taken, especially if the Placebo is positively dangerous.
Recent worldwide focus on Covid19 jabs has centred on Adverse Reactions, in comparison to Placebo, which is usually 0.9% Sodium Chloride in water, generally recognized as safe. However it has been proposed that Saline injection causes Histamine elevation to account for many observed adverse reactions.1
I have drawn attention to the high incidence of Nickel allergy as a further confounder of jabbing studies.2
In the case of AstraZeneca another jab with its own Adverse Reactions profile was used.
Respiratory Syncytial Virus vaccination during Pregnancy
I have just had a look at a trial of NovaVax RSV experimental jab where there were 52 authors, one of whom was also the principal author of the Phase 2/3 BioNTech Pfizer Covid19 jab trial.3
In the NovaVax RSV jab trial, there were 17 Deaths in recipients of the jab and 12 Deaths in those who received the “Placebo”.
Stillbirths or Foetal losses were 15 in the RSV jab and 9 in the Placebo group and the fate of 23 other foetuses was not stated.
The Placebo in the RSV trial was not just Saline. "The placebo treatment is comprised of 20mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.2, with 150mM sodium chloride, 0.9% histidine, and 0.03% PS-80; is manufactured by Althea Technologies (San Diego, California); and is supplied in single-use 2mL glass vials. Subjects randomized to the placebo group will receive a 0.5mL IM injection of this treatment."
Healthy pregnant women, at 28 to 36 weeks of gestation, with an expected delivery date near the start of the RSV season, were randomized with 3,045 women receiving a single intramuscular dose of RSV fusion (F) protein Nanoparticle vaccine and 1,581 were given “Placebo”. There were 4,579 live births. Infants were followed for 180 days to assess outcomes related to lower respiratory tract infection and for 364 days to assess safety. The trial was deemed to be a failure due to not reaching minimum efficacy.
Let us look at the known harms caused by two of the Placebo ingredients.
Histidine converted to Histamine
Intramuscular injection of Histidine will result in Histamine production4 that comes with many adverse reactions.5
A recent review shows that Histamine causes inflammatory responses, vasodilation, gastric acid production, congestion and bronchospasm, and secretion in the respiratory system.6
Polysorbate 80
Polysorbate 80, with molecular weight 1,310 includes Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) chains. Polysorbate 80 is known to cause severe hypersensitive reactions, which are typical non-immune anaphylactic reactions.
It is known to cause Complement activation when injected into Beagle dogs.7
Complement Activation-Related Pseudoallergy (CARPA) is casually described by drug developers as causing “simple discomfort to lethal reaction in man”.8
Pigs have been used to study the wide ranging effects of Polysorbate 80.9
Polysorbate is known to degrade to form toxic products.10
Other studies where Harmful ingredients are in Placebo
Other critics have raised concerns of trial manipulation by use of reactogenic materials in the control arm of jab trials.11
In some cases the actual contents of the Placebo is unknown.12
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1702797/v1
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1908380
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histidine
https://www.mayoclinic.org/drugs-supplements/histamine-intradermal-route/side-effects/drg-20064149
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2228
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S156757691200313X
https://minipigs.dk/fileadmin/filer/Presentations/Pseudoallergic_reactions_in_the_Minipig.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0169409X12002244
https://www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/569560-Polysorbate-the-Good-the-Bad-and-the-Ugly/
https://ebm.bmj.com/content/25/6/213
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2776287
Brandy Vaughan, who spent time educating people about pharma, vaccines in particular, said vaccine trials are or were allowed to use other vaccines in control group resulting in more favourable results for the trial. Her dedication of educating and informing parents put her in a dangerous position and she received lots of intimidation. RIP Brandy.
I've had similar ruminations. Looking at many of these clinical trials (and likely those that they decide not to report on) , participating seems riskier than not participating.