Feb 1, 2023·edited Feb 1, 2023Liked by GeoffPainPhD
Thanks Dr Geoff. This is a great reference.
The Japanese and Chinese trials both state the research is in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.
I guess it is ironic that in reality, with the mandates and social coercion, that the Declaration was totally trod upon.
I mean, this is the first general principle stated:
" The Declaration of Geneva of the WMA binds the physician with the words, ****“The health of my patient will be my first consideration,”**** and the International Code of Medical Ethics declares that, “A physician shall act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.”"
Pretty sure that was NOT the first consideration these last few years, sadly.
The 8th clause:
"While the primary purpose of medical research is to generate new knowledge, this goal can never take precedence over the rights and interests of individual research subjects."
And here is the 9th clause:
" It is the duty of physicians who are involved in medical research to protect the life, health, ****dignity, integrity, right to self-determination,**** privacy, and confidentiality of personal information of research subjects. "
Probably quoting this Declaration is "disinformation" at this point. How can anyone have the "right to self-determination" when Pfizer's global expansion is at stake???
Anyway I will have to study the results of these different trials so more a bit later.
Already the Japanese one showed that 1 person in the quite small BNT162b2 group (119 people) had such a severe systemic adverse reaction that this person had to discontinue. Not a great sign but ignored totally by the world of course...
Thanks Dr Geoff. This is a great reference.
The Japanese and Chinese trials both state the research is in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.
I guess it is ironic that in reality, with the mandates and social coercion, that the Declaration was totally trod upon.
I mean, this is the first general principle stated:
" The Declaration of Geneva of the WMA binds the physician with the words, ****“The health of my patient will be my first consideration,”**** and the International Code of Medical Ethics declares that, “A physician shall act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.”"
Pretty sure that was NOT the first consideration these last few years, sadly.
The 8th clause:
"While the primary purpose of medical research is to generate new knowledge, this goal can never take precedence over the rights and interests of individual research subjects."
And here is the 9th clause:
" It is the duty of physicians who are involved in medical research to protect the life, health, ****dignity, integrity, right to self-determination,**** privacy, and confidentiality of personal information of research subjects. "
Probably quoting this Declaration is "disinformation" at this point. How can anyone have the "right to self-determination" when Pfizer's global expansion is at stake???
Anyway I will have to study the results of these different trials so more a bit later.
Already the Japanese one showed that 1 person in the quite small BNT162b2 group (119 people) had such a severe systemic adverse reaction that this person had to discontinue. Not a great sign but ignored totally by the world of course...
Geoff, what is your @ twitter handle that is suspended? I can't believe they reinstated me and am going to push for some others to also be freed.